MeltDBWiki/RoundingMZ: Difference between revisions

From BRF-Software
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>HeikoNeuweger
No edit summary
imported>HeikoNeuweger
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
== Round m/z values of mass spectra to integral values ==
== Round m/z values of mass spectra to integral values ==


* Several mass spectral databases contain mass spectra in nominal m/z notation whereas MS instruments are able to obtain higher resolution.
* Several mass spectral databases used for the identification of metabolites in GC/MS measurements (EI) contain mass spectra in nominal m/z notation whereas MS instruments are able to obtain higher resolution.
* High resolution mass spectra can be compared to nominal m/z spectra by rounding the measured m/z values to integral values.
* The mass spectral lookup using e.g. the ''dot-product' of the query and database spectra is inaprropriate if high resolution spectra are compared to spectra with nominal m/z entries. One possibility is to transform the high resolution spectra to integral m/z values. Alternatively, adapted scoring methods can be applied.
* High resolution mass spectra can be compared to nominal m/z spectra by ''rounding'' the measured m/z values to integral values.
* It is questionable if ''rounding'' at 0.5 is the best option.
* The KEGG compounds database contains more than 10000 compounds with annotated masses and most of the masses are below 1000 Dalton.
* The KEGG compounds database contains more than 10000 compounds with annotated masses and most of the masses are below 1000 Dalton.
* C, H, N, O, P, S are the main atoms of biological compounds.
* C, H, N, O, P, S are the main atoms of biologically relevant compounds.


[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histweight.png]]
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histweight.png]]
Line 15: Line 17:
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$scatter.png]]
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$scatter.png]]


* In the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 15 compounds are listed in the KEGG compounds database.
* Mass spectrometric devices may drift, meassured m/z values can therefore vary.
* Mass spectrometric devices may drift, meassured m/z values can therefore vary.
* To round m/z to integral values as robust as possible, 0.75 instead of 0.5 may be used.
* To round m/z to integral values as robust as possible, 0.7 instead of 0.5 may be used.  
* In the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 15 compounds are listed in the KEGG compounds database.


[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histmz.png]]
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histmz.png]]


* For all masses measured by a MS instrument (Ion Trap) during a complete chromatogram, the distribution of the values is comparable.
* For all masses measured by a MS instrument (EI, Ion Trap) during a complete chromatogram, the distribution of the values is comparable.
* Again, in the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 0.3% of the m/z values are detected.
* Again, in the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 0.3% of the m/z values are detected.


[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$mzfrac.png]]
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$mzfrac.png]]


* This observation is also useful if extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) of GC/MS measurements with integral m/z values need to be generated without following individual m/z traces. Again, a ''rounding'' of the m/z values at the 0.7 instead of 0.5 will provide more stable EICs.  
* This observation is also useful if extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) of GC/MS measurements with integral m/z values need to be generated without following individual m/z traces. Again, a ''rounding'' of the m/z values at 0.7 instead of 0.5 will provide more stable EICs.  


[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$cdfhist.png]]
[[Image:MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$cdfhist.png]]

Revision as of 22:10, 10 April 2008


Round m/z values of mass spectra to integral values

  • Several mass spectral databases used for the identification of metabolites in GC/MS measurements (EI) contain mass spectra in nominal m/z notation whereas MS instruments are able to obtain higher resolution.
  • The mass spectral lookup using e.g. the dot-product' of the query and database spectra is inaprropriate if high resolution spectra are compared to spectra with nominal m/z entries. One possibility is to transform the high resolution spectra to integral m/z values. Alternatively, adapted scoring methods can be applied.
  • High resolution mass spectra can be compared to nominal m/z spectra by rounding the measured m/z values to integral values.
  • It is questionable if rounding at 0.5 is the best option.
  • The KEGG compounds database contains more than 10000 compounds with annotated masses and most of the masses are below 1000 Dalton.
  • C, H, N, O, P, S are the main atoms of biologically relevant compounds.

MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histweight.png

  • The possible fractional values of the compound masses are dependent on the integral compound mass.

MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$scatter.png

  • In the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 15 compounds are listed in the KEGG compounds database.
  • Mass spectrometric devices may drift, meassured m/z values can therefore vary.
  • To round m/z to integral values as robust as possible, 0.7 instead of 0.5 may be used.

MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$histmz.png

  • For all masses measured by a MS instrument (EI, Ion Trap) during a complete chromatogram, the distribution of the values is comparable.
  • Again, in the fractional interval 0.7 to 0.75 only 0.3% of the m/z values are detected.

MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$mzfrac.png

  • This observation is also useful if extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) of GC/MS measurements with integral m/z values need to be generated without following individual m/z traces. Again, a rounding of the m/z values at 0.7 instead of 0.5 will provide more stable EICs.

MeltDBWiki$$RoundingMZ$cdfhist.png